Taxation on Business Transfers in Spain

The transfer of a business structure is one of the most complex and high-impact tax events in an entrepreneur's professional life. The difference between sound and poor planning can amount to millions of euros in net proceeds. This guide provides an in-depth analysis of the applicable taxes, transaction structures, optimisation strategies and common pitfalls, incorporating the regulations, case law and legislative changes in force as of March 2026.

1.  Deal Structures: Share Deal vs. Asset Deal

The first decision shaping the entire tax outcome is the transaction structure. There are two principal approaches, with radically different tax implications for both seller and buyer:

Criterion Share Deal (transfer of equity interests) Asset Deal (transfer of assets)
What is transferred? Shares or equity participations Individual assets and liabilities of the business
Tax (individual seller) PIT — capital gain (19%–30%) PIT as sole trader or CIT if the seller is a company
Tax (corporate seller) CIT 25% — potential 95% exemption (Art. 21 CIT Law) CIT 25% on the gain over net book value of each asset
VAT / Transfer Tax (TPO) VAT-exempt. Generally not subject to TPO (*see Art. 314 TRLMV note) VAT or TPO depending on the nature of each asset
Municipal capital gains tax Not applicable as a general rule Applicable if urban real estate is transferred
Buyer preference Lower (inherits the company's hidden liabilities) Higher (selects only the desired assets)
Seller preference Higher (greater tax certainty and simplicity) Lower (potential double taxation and higher overall cost)

 

EXCEPTION — Art. 314 TRLMV (formerly Art. 108 LMV): A share deal is NOT always exempt from VAT/TPO. If the transfer of equity interests grants control of a company whose assets consist of more than 50% real estate not used in an economic activity, the transaction may be subject to VAT or Transfer Tax (TPO) as if the underlying properties were being sold directly. This exception is particularly relevant for real estate holding companies, asset-holding vehicles and property investment structures. Omitting this analysis prior to closing constitutes a critical fiscal risk.

The majority of M&A transactions in Spain are structured as share deals due to their greater legal and tax simplicity for the seller. Asset deals are typically preferred when the buyer wants to ring-fence contingent liabilities or when the target holds a heterogeneous mix of assets.

2.  Personal Income Tax (PIT): Individual Sellers

Calculating the capital gain

When the seller is a Spanish tax-resident individual, the capital gain is included in the savings tax base of the Personal Income Tax (IRPF). The gain is calculated as the difference between the transfer value (sale price minus directly related transaction costs: advisory fees, notary, registration) and the acquisition cost (purchase price plus acquisition expenses and taxes paid at the time of purchase).

Tax rates 2025–2026

The legislature raised the top marginal rate to 30% for savings base income exceeding €300,000, with effect from 1 January 2025. The full scale applicable in 2026, combining state and regional rates, is as follows:

Taxable savings income State rate Regional rate (average) Combined rate
Up to €6,000 9.5% 9.5% 19.0%
€6,000 – €50,000 10.5% 10.5% 21.0%
€50,000 – €200,000 11.5% 11.5% 23.0%
€200,000 – €300,000 13.5% 13.5% 27.0%
Over €300,000 15.0% 15.0% 30.0%

 

The 30% top rate (in force since 2025) is two percentage points above the previous ceiling of 28%. Some Autonomous Communities may apply higher regional rates, pushing the combined rate above 30%. The applicable regional scale must always be verified based on the seller's tax residence during the year of disposal.

Illustrative example: A founder sells the company for €2,500,000 against an original acquisition cost of €200,000. The resulting gain of €2,300,000 would bear an approximate effective rate of 28.5%, generating a tax liability of around €655,000. This figure underscores why pre-sale structuring is essential for transactions of this scale.

Abatement coefficients (interests acquired before 31 December 1994)

If the equity interests were acquired before 31 December 1994, the transitional regime of abatement coefficients may apply (Transitional Provision 9 of the PIT Law), reducing the chargeable gain in proportion to the holding period prior to 1995. A cumulative cap of €400,000 on transfer value applies. This is a highly advantageous regime that still benefits many long-standing business owners and should always be assessed before being dismissed.

Instalment sale regime and deferred payments (Art. 14.2 PIT Law)

Where part of the consideration is received in tax years subsequent to the year of sale, the taxpayer may elect to apportion the capital gain pro rata to amounts received in each year (Art. 14.2 PIT Law). This regime defers tax to the point of actual receipt and can significantly reduce the tax burden in the year of the transaction.

Note — Deferred price vs. contingent consideration (earn-out): A fixed deferred payment qualifies automatically for the instalment deferral regime. An earn-out (performance-linked variable consideration) requires an initial fair-value estimate of the contingent amount at the time of sale; if the amount ultimately received differs from the estimate, the original tax return must be amended. This asymmetry introduces significantly greater audit risk if the initial estimate is not properly documented.

Earn-outs: contingent consideration linked to future performance

An earn-out is a variable component of the sale price whose quantum depends on the future performance of the business (EBITDA, revenue, operational milestones). Its tax treatment is more complex than that of a fixed deferred payment:

  • The AEAT requires the full capital gain — including a fair-value estimate of the contingent element — to be declared in the year of the transaction.
  • If the amount ultimately received differs from the initial estimate, the original return for the year of disposal must be amended, with interest adjustments as applicable.
  • If payment is expected more than one year after the transfer date, the instalment apportionment rule (Art. 14.2 PIT Law) may be applied, allocating the gain to each period as amounts are received.

Note: The sale and purchase agreement (SPA) must expressly decouple the earn-out from any obligation by the seller to remain employed or provide services post-closing. If the Spanish Tax Authority determines that receipt of the earn-out is conditional on the former owner's personal performance, it will reclassify the income as employment income — taxable in the general base at marginal rates that can exceed 50% in certain Autonomous Communities.

Non-compete clauses

Post-contractual non-compete arrangements compensate the seller for the restriction of their economic freedom following the transaction. Spanish administrative doctrine and Supreme Court case law are unanimous on the point: these receipts constitute employment income, not capital gains. Since they do not arise from a change in the composition of the seller's assets but from an obligation to 'refrain from acting', they are taxed in the general income base at marginal rates potentially exceeding 47%, not in the savings base (maximum rate 30%).

Note — Taxation in the source State: The Audiencia Nacional (National Court of Appeal) has reaffirmed that non-compete payments are taxable in Spain (the source State) even if the recipient has already transferred their tax residence abroad at the time of receipt. A pre-sale change of tax domicile does not eliminate withholding obligations or Spanish tax exposure on these amounts.

Special expatriate regime — Beckham Law (Art. 93 PIT Law)

Workers relocated to Spain who have opted for the special expatriate tax regime (colloquially known as the Beckham Law) enjoy a unique fiscal advantage in business sale transactions: capital gains arising from the disposal of shares or equity interests in non-Spanish entities are fully exempt from Spanish tax for the duration of the regime.

In 2026, this regime is particularly relevant for relocated executives, digital nomads and foreign founders with business assets outside Spain. In those cases, the Spanish tax liability on the disposal of their foreign equity interests can be nil. For interests in Spanish entities, the standard PIT treatment (19%–30%) applies.

Where the seller is a relocated executive or foreign entrepreneur under the Beckham regime, the tax analysis of the transaction is fundamentally different. Pre-sale planning around the legal domicile of the assets can be the difference between a 0% and a 30% effective tax rate on the capital gain.

Exemption on reinvestment in newly incorporated companies (Art. 38.2 PIT Law)

An individual may declare the entire capital gain exempt from tax if the proceeds are reinvested in the subscription of shares in a newly created company meeting the requirements of Art. 38.2 of the PIT Law:

  • Full reinvestment is required for a full exemption; partial reinvestment yields a proportionate exemption.
  • The reinvestment window is one year from the date of disposal.
  • The recipient entity must carry on a genuine economic activity with its own material and human resources.
  • Transfers to relatives up to the second degree of kinship or to related entities are excluded.
  • The recipient entity must not be listed on a regulated market at the time of the investment.

3.  Corporate Income Tax (CIT): Corporate Sellers

Applicable rates — 2025–2026

Law 7/2024 established a phased reduction of CIT rates for SMEs and micro-enterprises. The rates applicable in each year differ materially and must be clearly distinguished in any financial model:

Entity type Turnover CIT rate — 2025 CIT rate — 2026
Large company / general regime No limit 25% 25%
SME €1M – €10M 24% (flat) 23% (flat)
Micro-enterprise — bracket 1 < €1M 21% (first €50,000 of tax base) 19% (first €50,000 of tax base)
Micro-enterprise — bracket 2 < €1M 22% (remainder of tax base) 21% (remainder of tax base)

 

Any document covering both fiscal years (2025 and 2026) must clearly differentiate the applicable rates. The 23% SME rate only applies to tax periods commencing in 2026. In 2025, the applicable rate was 24%. Applying the wrong rate can produce a material error in the net proceeds model.

Participation exemption — Art. 21 CIT Law (holding structure)

The primary tax optimisation tool for corporate sellers is the participation exemption set out in Article 21 of the Corporate Income Tax Law (LIS). Its purpose is to eliminate economic double taxation on profits already taxed at the level of the subsidiary. All of the following conditions must be met simultaneously:

Requirement Condition — 2026
Minimum ownership stake At least 5% of the share capital of the target entity (or acquisition cost ≥ €20M in certain transitional cases up to 2025)
Holding period Continuous ownership for at least one year prior to the disposal date
Genuine economic activity The target entity must not qualify as a mere asset-holding company (more than 50% of assets must be engaged in an economic activity)
Minimum taxation The target entity must have been subject to a nominal tax rate of at least 10% (with exceptions under Double Tax Treaties)
Jurisdiction The target entity must not be domiciled in a tax haven, unless a genuine and substantial economic activity can be demonstrated

 

Note — 95% exemption, NOT 100%: Since the Anti-Tax Fraud Law (Law 11/2021), the participation exemption applies to only 95% of the gain. The remaining 5% is included in the CIT base as 'participation management costs', resulting in a minimum effective tax rate of 1.25% (5% × 25%) on the total gain. On a €5M gain, this equates to a CIT charge of €62,500. Omitting this detail from the pre-deal financial model is a material technical error.

Asset-holding companies and TS 2026 case law on real estate leasing

The Art. 21 exemption is unavailable if the target qualifies as an asset-holding company (Art. 5.2 LIS: more than 50% of assets consist of securities or non-business assets for more than 90 days of the financial year). This is the primary source of disputes between taxpayers and the Tax Authority.

In 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the employee requirement for real estate leasing activities may be satisfied where property management is centralised in another company within the same corporate group, provided a genuine economic-functional unit exists and the resources are genuinely deployed for the activity. This criterion broadens access to the Art. 21 exemption for real estate groups that centralise human resources across the group.

4.  Asset Deal: Taxation on the transfer of Assets

Corporate Income Tax

In an asset deal, the selling company is taxed under CIT on the difference between the sale price of each asset and its net book value (acquisition cost less accumulated depreciation). Existing tax loss carry-forwards can mitigate the CIT impact, which is a relevant factor in deal negotiations.

Value Added Tax and Transfer Tax (TPO)

The transfer of an entire autonomous economic unit (going-concern business) may qualify for the VAT exemption under Art. 7.1 of the VAT Law, preventing the generation of a VAT charge that the buyer could not immediately recover. Where this exemption does not apply, each asset is taxed according to its nature:

  • Operating assets: subject to and not exempt from VAT (standard rate 21%, except where reduced rates apply).
  • Second-transfer real estate: VAT-exempt but subject to Transfer Tax (TPO) at 6%–10% depending on the Autonomous Community.
  • First-transfer real estate: subject to VAT (10% for residential property, 21% for commercial premises) and Stamp Duty (AJD).

Municipal land value increment tax (IIVTNU — plusvalía municipal)

If the asset deal includes urban land or real estate, the seller is liable for the Municipal Land Value Increment Tax (IIVTNU). Following the Constitutional Court ruling of 2021, it is possible to challenge the tax where no real increase in land value has occurred — but this must be evidenced with comparable valuations at the time of acquisition and disposal. The tax can be substantial for assets held over a long period.

5.  Non - Resident Sellers — Non-Resident Income Tax (IRNR)

Applicable rates and Double Tax Treaties

Where the seller is not a Spanish tax resident, taxation is governed by the Non-Resident Income Tax Law (IRNR) and the applicable Double Tax Treaty (DTT) between Spain and the seller's country of residence. As a general rule, most DTTs assign exclusive taxing rights to the seller's country of residence. However, if more than 50% of the Spanish target's asset value consists of real estate, most DTTs allow Spain to tax the gain.

Non-resident seller type IRNR rate (no DTT) Notes
EU / EEA resident (with effective information exchange) 19% May be reduced or eliminated under an applicable DTT
Resident in a country with a favourable DTT Reduced DTT rate Valid tax residence certificate from the seller required
Other countries (no applicable DTT) 24% Withholding mandatory for the paying party
Transfer of Spanish real estate (any non-resident) 3% on total price Withheld and remitted by the buyer via Form 211

 

On transfers of Spanish real estate by non-residents, it is the buyer who must withhold and remit 3% of the total sale price to the Tax Authority (Form 211), not the AEAT directly. The non-resident seller settles the final tax liability via Form 210 and may claim a refund of any excess withheld. Without a valid tax residence certificate from the seller, the paying party must withhold under the standard IRNR rules.

6.  Family Business Regime: Taxation on Gratuitous Transfers

Where the business is transferred by way of inheritance or gift, the family business regime provides significant reductions in Inheritance and Gift Tax (ISD) and an exemption on the value of the participations in Wealth Tax (IP). The following conditions must be met simultaneously to access the relief:

Requirement Condition
Genuine economic activity The entity must not qualify as an asset-holding company (more than 50% of assets engaged in an economic activity)
Minimum ownership At least 5% individually, or 20% jointly with spouse, ascendants, descendants or collateral relatives up to the 2nd degree
Directorship requirement At least one member of the family group must exercise real management functions and derive more than 50% of their total employment and business income from those functions
Retention period 10 years from the date of acquisition under the state regime (Autonomous Communities may reduce this period)

 

State regime: 95% reduction and 10-year retention period

Under the state regime, the ISD reduction is 95% of the value of the transferred participations, subject to a 10-year activity and ownership retention period. Breach of this condition requires the filing of supplementary tax returns with interest for late payment, which can eliminate much of the tax benefit obtained.

Community of Madrid — Family Business Support Act (March 2026)

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE — MARCH 2026: The Community of Madrid has enacted the Family Business Support Act, introducing the most favourable family business regime in Spain, with material improvements over the state framework and all other regions.

The key changes introduced for Madrid from March 2026 are as follows:

Aspect State regime Madrid — from March 2026
ISD reduction 95% 99% (both inheritances and gifts)
Eligible beneficiaries Spouse, descendants, ascendants, collateral relatives up to 2nd degree Extended to collateral relatives up to the 4th degree (uncles, nephews, cousins)
Non-family employees Not applicable Applicable: employees with ≥ 10 years of seniority and ≥ 4 years in senior management roles
Retention period 10 years 5 years (reduced to prevent business closures)

 

The extension of the relief to non-family executives with a management track record is unprecedented in Spanish tax law. It allows a trusted director or senior manager to receive business participations at minimal tax cost, significantly facilitating management buyout (MBO) structures and non-family succession planning.

For business succession transactions in Madrid, the March 2026 framework offers Spain's most favourable combination: a 99% ISD reduction, a 5-year retention period and access for non-family senior executives. Any succession planning exercise should assess the merits of establishing Madrid as the seller's tax domicile ahead of the transfer.

Other notable Autonomous Communities

Although Madrid leads following the 2026 reform, several other regions also offer terms more favourable than the state baseline:

  • Andalusia: 99% reduction with a 3-year retention period for gifts (a precedent that partially inspired the Madrid reform).
  • Basque Country and Navarre: foral (chartered) regimes with 95%–99% reductions and territory-specific retention periods.
  • Other Autonomous Communities: generally apply the 95% state reduction with the 10-year retention period, though some have introduced partial improvements.

7.  Tax Planning Strategies

Tax planning is the single most impactful variable in determining the seller's net proceeds. The following are the principal levers available, all within the bounds of applicable law:

Pre-sale holding company structure (Art. 21 CIT Law)

Interposing a holding company as the owner of the operating company's equity interests can reduce the effective tax rate on the gain from 30% (individual PIT) to 1.25% (CIT with 95% exemption). The contribution of the interests to the holding must be executed under the tax neutrality regime (Chapter VII, Title VII of the CIT Law) and with sufficient lead time — a minimum of one year before the sale, although 2–3 years is recommended to withstand AEAT scrutiny on the holding's economic substance.

The AEAT scrutinises holding structures created shortly before a sale. The holding's economic substance (genuine registered office, effective management, own activity) and the valid business reasons for the restructuring are essential defensive arguments in the event of a tax audit.

Tax neutrality regime for corporate reorganisations

Mergers, demergers, business line contributions and share exchanges may qualify for the special neutrality regime under Chapter VII, Title VII of the CIT Law, deferring the taxation of latent gains until a subsequent disposal. The regime requires notification to the AEAT and the presence of valid business reasons beyond mere tax saving.

Staggered disposal across multiple tax years

Where the sale can be structured across multiple tax years, an individual seller may access the lower brackets of the savings income scale in each year, reducing the average effective rate. This strategy is particularly effective for mid-market transactions where the gain falls below the top brackets in any single year.

Instalment sales and earn-outs (Art. 14.2 PIT Law)

The pro rata apportionment regime defers PIT to the point of actual receipt. Combined with a properly structured and documented earn-out — characterised as a price adjustment rather than a service fee — this can materially reduce the effective rate. Correct documentation is essential to prevent reclassification as employment income.

Reinvestment in newly incorporated companies (Art. 38.2 PIT Law)

Full exemption on the capital gain via reinvestment in qualifying start-up companies within one year of disposal. One of the most powerful tools for individual sellers where the requirements set out in section 2.8 are met.

Tax residence planning and exit tax

Relocating tax residence to a lower-tax jurisdiction may be a legitimate planning option if executed with sufficient lead time. Spain applies an exit tax (Art. 95 bis PIT Law) to individuals who have been Spanish tax residents for at least 10 of the previous 15 years and whose financial portfolio exceeds €4 million (or €1 million if more than 25% is concentrated in a single entity).

Failure to satisfy the minimum effective residence requirements in the new jurisdiction may trigger the deferred exit tax with interest and penalties, negating much of the anticipated benefit.

Beckham Law for relocated executives

Sellers under the special expatriate tax regime may benefit from a full exemption on gains from the disposal of interests in non-Spanish entities. The pre-sale legal domicile of the assets is determinative. See section 2.7.

Family business succession (Madrid regime in particular)

For gratuitous transfers, the family business regime offers reductions of up to 99% in ISD, with the retention period reduced to 5 years in Madrid from March 2026. Combined with Wealth Tax exemption, it is the most efficient instrument for intergenerational transfers or disposals to trusted executives. See section 7.

8.  Comparative Summary of Tax Scenarios about Taxation on Business Transfers in Spain

Scenario Seller Approximate effective rate Key considerations
Direct disposal of equity interests Individual — Spanish resident 19%–30% PIT 30% top rate from 2025 for gains over €300,000
Disposal via holding company Corporate holding — Spanish resident ~1.25% CIT effective 95% exempt under Art. 21 CIT Law. Requires advance planning
Asset deal Operating company 25% CIT + VAT/TPO Possible VAT exemption if autonomous economic unit is transferred
Share deal with >50% real estate assets Any seller TPO as in asset deal Art. 314 TRLMV: critical exception — may be subject to TPO
Instalment sale / earn-out Individual — Spanish resident Deferred PIT Earn-out: must be documented as a price adjustment, not a service fee
Reinvestment in newly incorporated company Individual — Spanish resident 0% (full exemption) Reinvestment within 1 year; strict requirements under Art. 38.2 PIT Law
Seller under Beckham Law Relocated executive / impatriate 0% on foreign assets Full exemption for gains on equity interests in non-Spanish entities
Non-resident seller — EU/EEA Individual — EU/EEA non-resident 19% IRNR 3% withholding by buyer on real estate transfers (Form 211)
Non-resident with applicable DTT Individual — non-resident Reduced rate or 0% Valid tax residence certificate from the seller required
Gratuitous transfer — family business Madrid Heir / donee / senior executive 99% ISD reduction 5-year retention period in Madrid from March 2026

 

9.  Conclusión: Taxation on Business Transfers as a value driver

Executing a business transfer in 2026 demands a planning approach that combines tax efficiency with legal certainty. The regulatory environment is technically demanding: the PIT top rate has converged to 30%, the CIT participation exemption is capped at 95%, non-residents now benefit from equal ITSGF treatment, and the real estate exception under Art. 314 TRLMV represents a hidden risk in equity transactions with significant property exposure.

The gap between the most efficient scenario (holding structure with 95% exemption, or Beckham Law for foreign assets) and the least favourable (direct disposal by an individual at the 30% top rate) can exceed 28 percentage points on the gain. On a €3 million gain, that difference exceeds €840,000 in net proceeds — a compelling argument for early-stage planning.

The strategic priorities for any seller are: structure well in advance (a minimum of 2–3 years), document every element of the deal comprehensively (earn-outs, non-competes, value accruals), analyse the family business regime in light of the Madrid 2026 reforms, and verify the application of Art. 314 TRLMV in every transaction with material real estate exposure.

At Maraz Corporate Finance, we support our clients from initial planning through to final closing, coordinating tax analysis, business valuation and deal negotiation to maximise net proceeds. If you are considering the sale of your business, we invite you to contact our team for a bespoke and confidential analysis.

Javier de Rojas Roca de Togores

Socio - Maraz Corporate Finance